compare JFROG VS. GITHUB

Getting stuck trying to manage the lifecycle and security of your packages and binaries within your source control management solution?

Platform

Hybrid
Multi-Cloud
Multi-Site Replication & Federation
Fine-Grained Role-Based Access Control
Pricing Model

DevOps

Supported Technologies
Smart Caching for 3rd Party Package Repositories
Efficient Storage Management & Deduplication
Build Info - SBOM Creation At Build Time
Highly Flexible Query Language for Metadata-Based Search
Build Promotion
Advanced CI/CD Pipeline Automation
Cryptographically Signed Pipelines
Secure Software Distribution Across the Globe
Accelerated Deployments and Concurrent Downloads

DevSecOps

Expert Security Research Team
Quick Impact Analysis With Traceability
IDE Integration
Issue Tracker Integration
Integration Into Git Repositories
Single Pane Of Glass For Binary Security
Container Image Scanning
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Infrastructure As Code (IaC) Scanning
Exposed Secrets Detection
Detection Of Insecure Use Of Libraries And Services
Remediation Prioritization With Contextual Analysis
Operational Risk Analysis

IoT

Update, Control, Monitor And Secure Remote Linux & IoT Devices As First Class Citizens Of DevOps
Device-level Software Security
Remote Control and Remote Commands

Unlimited Users

32 Repository Types

Coming soon
Yes
Within container images - finished product

Azure only
Partial
Per User

6 Repository Types
Partial

Yes
Within source code

GitHub versus JFrog: Software Supply Chain

GitHub is a great source control management platform with good CI and integrated, community-oriented collaboration. When it comes to securely managing the lifecycle of software artifacts at scale, across the entire software development lifecycle, most enterprise-grade organizations that are concerned with trusted software supply chains will not be able to solely use GitHub. JFrog is thus a great GitHub alternative for companies looking for end-to-end software supply chain management.

Compare GitHub and JFrog

The JFrog Platform, with Artifactory at its core, is focused on managing the flow of software artifacts and the metadata relationships between them, and serves as a single system of record for the entire organization’s software inventory. Key capabilities of the Platform include proxying and caching 3rd party components for consistent, reliable access even across remote locations, as well as comprehensive security scanning that covers both source code and binaries. Moreover, GitHub Packages compared to JFrog Artifactory supports only a fraction of JFrog’s 30 package types with enterprise-grade support. For many organizations, this will inevitably mean setting up separate tools.

GitHub for Package Management

Given GitHub’s focus on source control management, their implementation of package management seems like a late add-on after the fact, with limited access control (per-package or per-repository), and no cross-repository artifact sharing between major repository types, which are blockers for many organizations. The JFrog Platform was built to track and store package workflow, approval, and usage metadata; and provide shared visibility with a structure that defines how, who, and where packages can be used.

GitHub Advanced Security Compared to JFrog Advanced Security

Despite its similar name, GitHub Advanced Security isn’t all that advanced when compared to JFrog Advanced Security, and offers the most basic of security capabilities. If you’re looking for an alternative to GitHub Advanced Security, it’s likely because GitHub is focused exclusively on scanning dependency manifests in the source code repository, lacking crucial features like context into the finished artifact, prioritization of long lists of vulnerabilities and actionable policies on the artifact workflow, like blocking its download or its release.

FAQ

What’s an alternative to GitHub for software packages?

Companies comparing GitHub to Artifactory for managing packages will often find that since GitHub was designed to manage source code, it is insufficient at enterprise scale to manage packages.

Who competes with GitHub?

GitHub competes with many companies. For example, companies comparing tools like GitHub with JFrog will often find that GitHub has excellent solutions for source control management, but has less robust solutions for binary management, security and software distribution. Other competitors include GitLab, Atlassian and more.