Compare JFrog VS. GitHub

Platform

Hybrid

Multi-Cloud

Multi-Site Replication & Federation

Fine-Grained Role-Based Access Control

DevOps

Supported Technologies

Smart Caching for 3rd Party Package Repositories

Efficient Storage Management & Deduplication

Build Info - SBOM Creation At Build Time

Highly Flexible Query Language for Metadata-Based Search

Release-First Lifecycle Management

Advanced CI/CD Pipeline Automation

Cryptographically Signed Pipelines

Secure Software Distribution Across the Globe

Accelerated Deployments and Concurrent Downloads

DevSecOps

Expert Security Research Team

First Line of Defense for Allowing Only Policy-Compliant OSS Packages into your Software Supply Chain

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Quick Impact Analysis With Traceability

IDE Integration

Issue Tracker Integration

Integration Into Git Repositories

Comprehensive Container Image Scanning

Single Pane Of Glass For Binary Security

Efficient, Locally-Run 1st Party Code Scanning (SAST)

Infrastructure As Code (IaC) Scanning

Exposed Secrets Detection

Detection Of Insecure Use Of Libraries And Services

Remediation Prioritization With Contextual Analysis

Operational Risk Analysis

IoT

Update, Control, Monitor And Secure Remote Linux & IoT Devices As First Class Citizens Of DevOps

Device-level Software Security

Remote Control and Remote Commands

32 Repository Types

Seamless performance and developer experience

Yes

Within container images - finished product

Azure only

Partial

6 Repository Types

Partial

Yes

Within source code

GitHub versus JFrog: Software Supply Chain

GitHub is a great source control management platform with good CI and integrated, community-oriented collaboration. When it comes to securely managing the lifecycle of software artifacts at scale, across the entire software development lifecycle, most enterprise-grade organizations that are concerned with trusted software supply chains will not be able to solely use GitHub. JFrog is thus a great GitHub alternative for companies looking for end-to-end software supply chain management.

Compare GitHub and JFrog

The JFrog Platform, with Artifactory at its core, is focused on managing the flow of software artifacts and the metadata relationships between them, and serves as a single system of record for the entire organization’s software inventory. Key capabilities of the Platform include proxying and caching 3rd party components for consistent, reliable access even across remote locations, as well as comprehensive security scanning that covers both source code and binaries. Moreover, GitHub Packages compared to JFrog Artifactory supports only a fraction of JFrog’s 30 package types with enterprise-grade support. For many organizations, this will inevitably mean setting up separate tools.

GitHub for Package Management

Given GitHub’s focus on source control management, their implementation of package management seems like a late add-on after the fact, with limited access control (per-package or per-repository), and no cross-repository artifact sharing between major repository types, which are blockers for many organizations. The JFrog Platform was built to track and store package workflow, approval, and usage metadata; and provide shared visibility with a structure that defines how, who, and where packages can be used.

GitHub Advanced Security Compared to JFrog Advanced Security

Despite its similar name, GitHub Advanced Security isn’t all that advanced when compared to JFrog Advanced Security, and offers the most basic of security capabilities. If you’re looking for an alternative to GitHub Advanced Security, it’s likely because GitHub is focused exclusively on scanning dependency manifests in the source code repository, lacking crucial features like context into the finished artifact, prioritization of long lists of vulnerabilities and actionable policies on the artifact workflow, like blocking its download or its release.

try the jfrog platform

FAQ

What’s an alternative to GitHub for software packages?

Companies comparing GitHub to Artifactory for managing packages will often find that since GitHub was designed to manage source code, it is insufficient at enterprise scale to manage packages.

Who competes with GitHub?

GitHub competes with many companies. For example, companies comparing tools like GitHub with JFrog will often find that GitHub has excellent solutions for source control management, but has less robust solutions for binary management, security and software distribution. Other competitors include GitLab, Atlassian and more.